Brownlie's principles of public international law. [James Crawford; Ian Brownlie] -- Serving as a single volume introduction to the field as a whole, this book seeks. Editorial Reviews. Review. Review from previous edition: "This systematic and balanced Support Advanced Search · Kindle Store; ›; Kindle eBooks; ›; Law. This is the eighth edition of Sir Ian Brownlie's classic distillation of public international law. Serving as a single volume introduction to the field.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|Genre:||Science & Research|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Registration needed]|
The sixth edition of Ian Brownlie's comprehensive and authoritative textbook has been thoroughly revised and updated to take into account all changes in the. Serving as a single-volume introduction to the field as a whole, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law seeks to present international law as a system. Read ebook Ebook download Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law For Android Download file Download now.
While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers.
This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3. Includes bibliographical references and index. It resembles … in form though not at all in content, a simple regime of primary or customary law. Whilst few international lawyers today would doubt the real- ity of international law as a legal system in the sense described, there remain persistent doubts and anxieties over the quality of this system, its overall autonomy from the political realm, and hence its capacity to secure the rule of law at the global level.
Soons Leiden, Brill, Nijhoff, For as long as it has been thought of as a legal system on broadly similar terms to domestic law, international lawyers have had to defend the reality, efficacy and, indeed, importance of international law in the conduct of international politics.
The perception of international law as a primitive or otherwise deficient legal order has been a recurring theme in international law scholarship. In comparison to a well-functioning rule of law state, the decentralised institu- tional architecture of international law appears to leave it structurally inde- terminate: its rules seemingly more malleable, more open and, overall, more difficult to disentangle from underlying political forces.
See Hart n 1 89—91 on the internal point of view and applied to international law.
There is no formal legislative body, no court machinery with general compulsory jurisdiction and no police force … While this may not be a serious defect because of the different purpose of international law, there will always be some difficulties, especially if malefactors are perceived to be able to violate the law with impunity.
Rather, as I argue in this volume, they have attempted to defend its reality as an autonomous system of rules capable of cohesively regulating international relations and pre-empting the political freedom of states.
This book is an attempt to engage with this problem: to better understand why it arises, upon what assumptions it is premised, and what effect it has had on our thinking about the nature and potential of legal norms to struc- ture or regulate international politics. The Institutional Problem: An Explanation 5 at demonstrating that if the institutional problem is a problem at all, it is one that inheres more in theory than in practice.
Let me now explain this problem further. The claim is certainly not without ambiguity.
From one perspective, to recognise the autonomy of international law is to say simply that the international legal order possesses the qualities of a legal system. By this, no more need be meant than that the various decisions, rules and principles of which the law consists do not appear … randomly related to each other.
I discuss the ambiguities surrounding the idea of the autonomy of law at length at the start of Ch 6. Like any legal system, international law is a social construct and has come to be understood in this way because this systemic understanding is deemed meaningful and important to inter- national legal participants—states, lawyers, diplomats and other actors—as a basis of association in their mutual relations. The Institutional Problem: An Explanation 7 Insofar as states and other participants place value on this kind of legal objectivity, it is possible to say that there is, at least at some level, a broad commitment to the rule of law as a governing principle in international relations.
In other words, the system is deliberately constructed so as to defer back to states on questions of 34 Nardin n 31 passim. Indeed, such particular purposes may very well be advanced through the legal framework, which provides a means of legiti- mising as much as condoning state behaviour.
The line between the legal and the political is drawn in a different place in the international legal system than it is in a developed, domestic legal order. How should we respond to this apparent structural indeterminacy?
Indeed, in the context of the kind of political relations that pertain at the international level, any other view of legal order would not only appear conceptually problematic, but arguably also empirically unrealistic and politically divisive.
The problem—the institutional problem—therefore arises specifi- cally not only because this kind of presumption is pervasive in the modern discipline, but, more critically, because it is arguably implicit within many of the most dominant modes of conceptual and normative enquiry about law and legal systems more generally—that is, exactly the kind of paradig- matic understandings against which international law is held up to such anxious scrutiny.
Spe- cifically, in Part II, I will argue that legal theory has essentially fixated on the historically and socially contingent problems of state-based author- ity, thereby co-opting state institutional features as necessary rather than contingent aspects of law in general.
I mount this challenge as I believe that rather than challenge jurispruden- tial paradigms, international lawyers, in the main, have most often attempted to try to make international law fit this incoherent structural mould.
This tendency has resulted in a rather unconvincing and, I believe, self-defeating effort to explain how, despite its apparent weaknesses, international law can nonetheless function as a coercive legal order capable of effectively regulat- ing the conduct of international relations. This response is, I believe, deeply problematic. It not only risks distort- ing understanding of the peculiar institutional characteristics of international law, but it also potentially bestows a legitimacy and authenticity on state actions and intergovernmental institutional structures which extends well beyond their rather more limited, delegated legal form.
In doing so, as I now further explain, this response only serves to further exacerbate or intensify already-existing rule of law concerns. What is the Legal nature of public international law? See 2 questions about Principles of Public International Law….
Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews.
Showing Rating details. More filters. Sort order. May 12, Alexander Francis rated it really liked it Shelves: It was very boring but insightful.
Don't try to read the whole thing in one sitting unless you are trying to break a record or impress your friends. Note to those trying to impress their friends by reading this in one sitting: They will think you are crazy and won't in the slightest be impressed. Seriously though, this book is really helpful if you need to know the basics of international law. View 1 comment. Jan 03, Es rated it it was amazing. This is an exceptional book. When we joined the Jessup International Moot Court competition last , this was very helpful.
It's not only the substance that I was able to appreciate but also the way it was written. It may be helpful to non-lawyers reading this book, in a future edition, to elaborate footnote 27 on p, bring it into the main body of the text, and to bind together the subsections of part 3 formally if this has not already been done. Jan 29, Shakilaeva marked it as to-read. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Oct 28, Jennifer rated it liked it. What can I say, it's a text book. Canan Topcu rated it liked it Oct 14, Sonia rated it it was amazing Dec 05, Ekpere Ephraim rated it it was amazing Nov 10, Bhala Charan rated it it was amazing Apr 07, Xiangja rated it liked it Sep 26, Santosh Pandey rated it it was ok Dec 08, Jaime Granados rated it it was amazing Jun 19, Shace Buhay rated it it was amazing Jul 23, Fred Motson rated it really liked it Aug 19, Luana Gomes rated it really liked it Jan 18, Omran rated it really liked it Feb 06, George Lekatis rated it it was amazing Jun 05, Afia Khan rated it really liked it Nov 20, David Smith rated it liked it Jun 26,